On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Harry Duncan wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Are you saying that you could not modify mails with filters if the > > mail is sent using SMTP AUTH? > > > > You can modify mail regardless of whether or not AUTH is used.
But the AUTH would give a per-user hook for out-bound scripting purposes... > >> However, even with all of that done, there's little or nothing stopping > >> your users from sending email from somewhere else. You probably have > >> too much senior management... they seem to be getting bored and worrying > >> about non-existent threats. > >> > > > > Actually there is strict european legislation being enacted across the > > EU which is mandating that emails be boilerplated with full company > > legal name, legal structure and list of company principals, and > > failure to comply can mean 250K in fines and imprisionment. I'd say > > thats a very existent threat for any management to worry about. > > > > That's not what was asked. But a solution to either one solves both. Basically, aren't we saying(?): 1. As a company, mandate *no* signatures on the mail client for the company account. 2. Require SMTP AUTH. 3. Globally filter such that the script uses auth info to lookup fullname, title, etc. externally 4. Add txt/html formatted signature as needed. See? Simple. ;-) jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
