Am Sonntag 15 August 2010, 14:10:06 schrieb Sam Varshavchik: > But I'm not sure why you believe that autoreplies should not include > the original message, quoted.
Because you quote _only the part that you reply to_. And an autoreply does not answer anything that the sender may have asked in his message. The content of the reply does not have anything to do with the original message content. Full quotes with no reply associated to the content of the message are discouraged everywhere, IMO. Look at it the other way: Why do you think it is a good idea to have a different handling of plain text messages opposed to multipart ones? I understand that it's way more difficult to handle multipart this way, but wouldn't it be a good thing to have a common way to go and leave out quoting altogether (optionally)? When two people send me mail and one gets a quoted reply to his plain text message and the other one gets a simple unquoted reply to his plain text message with a PGP signature, this is not what I want. Well, stay with your opinion. It's not that difficult to write a mailbot replacement on my own. I'll go that way.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
