On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 12:58 PM Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-48/pull/15/files > > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-125/pull/10/files > > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-126/pull/15/files > > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-128/pull/14/files > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-151/pull/6/files > > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-160/pull/20/files > > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-178/pull/17/files > > https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-209/pull/17/files > > I've merged all of these changes. I've made minor changes, e.g. moving the SPDX declaration comment inside the HTML head element of each document, and I fixed unrelated HTML warnings along the way. On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:42 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <[email protected]> wrote: > I just checked SRFI 209. Doesn't your patch now remove the embedded > license in some files? > Thanks for reviewing that. I checked Maxim's latest version of the patch, and it doesn't have that problem. Thanks to Maxim for making all those changes, and to everyone for their reviews. 245 SRFIs to go!
