Hi Marc, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <[email protected]> writes:
> I just checked SRFI 209. Doesn't your patch now remove the embedded > license in some files? It did. I had the permission from Wolfgang to do so, so it'd have been OK legally to do so. Given the recent discussions with John, we've agreed to move toward keeping the full license text notices intact (not replacing them), so that copying files around makes complying with the Expat (MIT) license slightly easier. I've now adjusted accordingly. Please give it another look when you have the chance. https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-48/pull/15/files https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-125/pull/10/files https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-126/pull/15/files https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-128/pull/14/files https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-151/pull/6/files https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-160/pull/20/files https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-178/pull/17/files https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-209/pull/17/files -- Thanks, Maxim
