I just checked SRFI 209.  Doesn't your patch now remove the embedded
license in some files?

Am Fr., 8. Dez. 2023 um 21:58 Uhr schrieb Maxim Cournoyer <
[email protected]>:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I've reviewed and sent a first batch of SRFIs made REUSE compliant [0]
> (meaning, "reuse lint" says it is so -- all files have copyright and
> licensing identification).
>
> You'll find the list below.  Feedback welcome!
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-48/pull/15/files
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-125/pull/10/files
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-126/pull/15/files
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-128/pull/14/files
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-151/pull/6/files
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-160/pull/20/files
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-178/pull/17/files
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-209/pull/17/files
>
> [0]  https://reuse.software/
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Maxim
>

Reply via email to