along these same lines, Cisco has been open about their internal auditing of
"live load" that they conducted ~5 years ago.  they found that the typical
utilization/occupancy of an assigned desk or cube was ~35%.   This
translates to a capacity per workstation of ~2.5.  I've seen this 35% number
corroborated by other large enterprises who have done similar studies, so i
think it is a reasonable planning target for a coworking venue that has a
broad cross section of professionals (ie the same level of diversity that a
large employer like Cisco has across its employee base...sales, mktg,
engineering, manufacturing, customer service, exec,  etc...).   If a cowork
community builds up with a more vertical focus on one type of
professional... well then your results will probably vary.




Mark Gilbreath
founder/deckhand/CEO
208-720-8107
[email protected] <[email protected]>
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markgilbreath
<[email protected]>skype: mfgilbreath
twitter: liquidspaceapp

*LiquidSpace(TM) - a better space to work.*
*We're a location-based mobile application that lets you use your phone to
find a better space to meet and work, book it, check in securely, and share
it with your colleagues.   Visit www.liquidspaceapp.com to learn more!*



On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Jerome Chang <[email protected]>wrote:

> Ahhh, that's what I thought.  Theoretically, the limit could be 2:1, but I
> people will tend to overlap during the same time slots.  But yes, I agree if
> you had a high % of sales people in your community, you might even be able
> to raise the limit to 6:1!
>
>
> Jerome
> ______________
> BLANKSPACES
> "work FOR yourself, not BY yourself"
>
> www.blankspaces.com
> 5405 Wilshire Blvd (2 blocks west of La Brea)
> Los Angeles, CA 90036
> 323.330.9505 (office)
>
> On Jan 7, 2011, at 10:22 AM, mark gilbreath wrote:
>
> regarding 2:1, our observation at VengaWorks was that the actual "live
> load" (ie what % of the time allotted in their membership are they actually
> occupying a chair in your space) of our members varied tremendously, with
> some loose correlation to professional role.  s/w developers tended to be
> much more present.  sales/mktg/freelancers tended to be less present.
> somewhat obvious.    i think the takeaway here is that the community you
> choose to build (developers vs writers vs freelancers vs sales roadwarriors
> vs mktg vs regional execs, vs all the above) will likely have a direct
> impact on the "live load" that you experience, and this has to be factored
> into your pricing model.
>
>
> Mark Gilbreath
> founder/deckhand/CEO
> 208-720-8107
> [email protected] <[email protected]>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/markgilbreath
>  <[email protected]>skype: mfgilbreath
> twitter: liquidspaceapp
>
> *LiquidSpace(TM) - a better space to work.*
> *We're a location-based mobile application that lets you use your phone to
> find a better space to meet and work, book it, check in securely, and share
> it with your colleagues.   Visit www.liquidspaceapp.com to learn more!*
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jerome Chang <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Just a quick note: $11-$12/sf????  We're at $25/sf-$40/sf here in L.A.!
>>
>> Also, how successful have you been to accommodate 2:1?  I haven't tested
>> that limit here at BLANKSPACES, but can't imagine that we'd be able to hit
>> it either.
>>
>>
>> Jerome
>> ______________
>> BLANKSPACES
>> "work FOR yourself, not BY yourself"
>>
>> www.blankspaces.com
>> 5405 Wilshire Blvd (2 blocks west of La Brea)
>> Los Angeles, CA 90036
>> 323.330.9505 (office)
>>
>> On Jan 7, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Jazzman3 wrote:
>>
>> > To our friends at Denver Coworking....
>> >
>> > What space?    What do your members or potential members want?
>> > Managing the space?   Managing the members?   Really the essential
>> > questions raised in the course of setting up coworking space.
>> >
>> > Some guiding principles:  1)  Have members and/or potential members go
>> > through the space (if possible) and get their feedback.   Angel and
>> > the other coworking pros are correct in "what do your members (and
>> > prospects) think?"
>> > 2)  After managing many buildings (both personal and professionally),
>> > and running a business incubator for 11 years, you need to consider
>> > the building (space) itself.   If the space is the hardware (space,
>> > HVAC, internet, lighting, flexible space, etc), and the community is
>> > the software (programming, members, events, coworking community), you
>> > really need both to make it work.   And while leading with community
>> > is essential, if the heat doesn't work, or the Internet is down, or
>> > the space isn't flexible, the community side isn't supported and your
>> > coworking space (and community)  will not work in the long term.
>> > 3) From the building side (space support), more flexibility, more open
>> > space, more options is better.   At DurangoSpace, all of our
>> > furnishings (Hon Huddle, Hon Basyx, 9to5 Brio exec seating, Mayline
>> > Valore task seating are on wheels and flexible.    We plan on
>> > rearranging our space all of the time.   However, with walls, you are
>> > limited.     But you need some walls to define space.   Those needs
>> > are more critical than "Loft vs. Mansion".
>> > 4)  In our business model, based on the coworking metrics of 2 members
>> > per one workspace, and 100 SF per workspace, we have calculated space
>> > this way:     Our DurangoSpace is 2650 SF in the 1200 block of Main
>> > Avenue in Durango, CO.  So that would be about 26 workspaces
>> > (capacity), with could serve 40 to 50 members (max at 50).    But we
>> > need 23 members (or equivelent) to break even, and 30 to 40 is the
>> > sweet spot.       But to do this we had to have $11 to $12 SF rent.
>> > Some places in town were $14 to $22 SF, which was outside our revenue
>> > model budget.    So back to you Mansion vs. Loft:  Can your members
>> > afford it?
>> >
>> > Hope this helps.
>> >
>> > Jasper
>> > DurangoSpace
>> >
>> >
>> > On Jan 2, 4:10 pm, Denver Coworking <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> I am trying to select a new location for a cowering facility in Denver
>> >> and I'm debate the type of building. I noticed that Conjuncture is in
>> >> an old mansion and it's really working for them, in fact they are
>> >> expanding to the neighboring house. Most other coworking spots are in
>> >> office buildings or converted lofts with a few other ones being in
>> >> strip malls, although the strip mall coworking facilities are a bit
>> >> rare.
>> >>
>> >> From your experience what do you like the most and why - old mansion
>> >> v. open office layout?
>> >>
>> >> My pros and cons:
>> >>
>> >> Old Mansions
>> >>
>> >>         Pros: Great home feel, yard and patio access, available cheap
>> street
>> >> parking, segmented rooms with up to 8 to 10 cowers in each, lounge
>> >> space, kitchen, showers often included for bikers, lower rents.
>> >>
>> >>         Cons: Layout can be broken up to 5 larger rooms v. 1 or 2
>> larger
>> >> ones, location is off the main streets, less of a professional feel
>> >> (pro and con) for meeting clients at, the lack of a giant open floor
>> >> plan prevents larger (15+) people events being held.
>> >>
>> >> Office/Lofts
>> >>
>> >>         Pros: Configured to have a giant open floor plan, more of a
>> >> professional but casual atmosphere, often in a good location, a
>> >> parking lot may be available with the lease, close to public transit,
>> >> often closer to business clients of members.
>> >>
>> >>         Cons: Higher rents and expensive parking if lot is not
>> available.
>> >>
>> >> What do you think?
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Coworking" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<coworking%[email protected]>
>> .
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Coworking" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<coworking%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Coworking" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Coworking" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<coworking%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Coworking" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.

Reply via email to