Ah! SO sorry, I made a huge mistake and left out an important part: we use
the Airport Extremes for wireless ONLY. They're dumb wifi repeaters.

We use the DLink DIR-655 for assigning and managing IPs, traffic shaping,
etc. It runs like a champ with all of our traffic. Hasn't had to be rebooted
in months. The D-LINK's wifi kinda sucked though, so we shut that off.

http://www.dlink.com/DIR-655

-Alex

/ah
indyhall.org
coworking in philadelphia


On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Jerome Chang <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> Sorry folks, but I'd have to disagree.  I tried to use an Airport Extreme,
> then added another and we quickly overwhelmed them.  We upgraded to a DLink
> commercial grade router and within a year (or less!), that fizzled.  We now
> use Meraki AP's and router (since March 2011) and so far so good.
>  Basically, the Apple Extreme's simply couldn't handle the load for about
> 40 simultaneous "devices."  Remember that many people now use 2-3 devices
> (laptop + phone/tablet), so you should anticipate x2.
>
> For the Apple Extreme's, we ended up having to often turn off and on
> sometimes 1-2/day.  The reason was that these Apple Extreme's would not
> flush out IP addresses.  We concluded that in an environment where you might
> have the same 40 people, these AE's might be appropriate.  But when we host
> an event for 50 people...
>
> Also, AE's don't allow you to manage the user connections: no throttling,
> no activity per IP address, etc.  In an age of dropbox and all things cloud,
> all it takes is one uneducated user to think they can upload a 1 gb movie
> file to ruin the bandwidth for everyone else.  Or say, when video streaming
> and other heavy bandwidth usage peaks around lunch time because everyone's
> watching NetFlix streaming while they take a break.
>
> Finally, how is everyone getting these fat 40mb pipes???  We pay $600/mo
> for a 5/5 EoC, and $900/mo for 10/10.  And some $200/mo I think for 10/2 DSL
> (SLA, not consumer).  I can only speculate a 50/10 or something must be $$.
>  Oh, and we need the synchronous 5/5 or 10/10 for our VoIP handsets.  We use
> QoS to prioritize the phone data packets; otherwise, we'd need 20/20 or
> more!
>
>
> Jerome
>    ______________
> BLANKSPACES
> "work FOR yourself, not BY yourself"
>
> www.blankspaces.com
> ph: 323.330.9505 | 5405 Wilshire Blvd (2 blocks west of La Brea) Los
> Angeles, CA 90036
> ph: 310.526.2255 | 1450 2nd Street (@ Broadway), Santa Monica, CA 90401
>
> On Aug 26, 2011, at 7:53 AM, Pat Ramsey wrote:
>
> Josh,
>
> Never had any issues with the firewall. I eyeball the logs every so often &
> haven't seen anything odd.
>
> The primary base station works great as a central router - no DHCP issues,
> NAT works great, DNS etc. Very low-key & stable, as it should be.
>
> On the wireless side of things, there's no way we would be able to
> satisfactorily handle more than 15 or so people on 1 wireless router. Don't
> even try it. So I bought two (plus, it made the little red light in the back
> of my head slow down. 2 is 1, 1 is none, etc) of the Extremes.
>
> We segmented out our cloud into three, in order to provide connection
> points for the different speeds without causing a slowdown for faster
> devices. Each uses the same wireless key, so it's convenient for users to
> get on. My original plan of 1 cloud for all failed spectacularly the day we
> had a visitor with an old 802.11b card connect, killing connection speeds
> for everyone. D'oh!
>
> Cheers!
>
> Pat
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Josh Aberson wrote:
>
> Thanks Pat, appreciate the help.
>
> I was looking into the Airport extreme option. I really like that it has
> USB connectivity for shared drives, and that it's a dual antenna so can
> separate out networks for different uses. Am mainly concerned with firewall
> protection on the main line coming in.
>
> Have you ever had any issues with the firewall on those?  Also, if you
> didn't have two, do you think your 45 members would bog it down?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Josh Aberson
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 26, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Pat Ramsey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Josh,
>
> Congratulations, first off. Welcome to the fun!
>
> What are the connectivity needs of your users? Are they pushing large
> amounts of code & files daily? Are you serving data from your end?
>
> We've always gone with a "reasonable" uplink. Business DSL for a long time,
> then a cable line in addition, eventually adding fiber for data & keeping a
> dsl for 1 member's VOIP phone.
>
> I've been in IT long enough to know you can never have a large enough pipe,
> so set the expectations early, find out what's the right size without
> busting your budget & work with your members - know them well enough - to
> avoid any hurt feelings, problems, etc.
>
> We're at around 40-ish members now. Our data line is fiber, 5 up / 5 down,
> I think it is. Our core router is an Airport Extreme base station. Off that
> is a 24-port gigabit switch, as the space came with some wired data ports.
> We run another Airport Extreme to extend the cloud in the main room.
> Extended off that is a Linksys & a D-link wireless router (both flashed with
> dd-wrt). Each of these has a old network printer attached to it.
>
> Easy-peasy, pretty much runs itself.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> On Aug 25, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Josh Aberson wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Without getting into too much introduction and details, I'll just cut right
> to it.
>
> I'm opening a space next week in South Dakota.  Working on finalizing
> details right now, and one thing I'm not too sure about is internet.  We've
> got 20 members or so pre-signed to move in day 1 and in trying to plan for
> the future, am trying to figure out what sort of internet speed I need, and
> what sort of router to handle the space's size and amount of people.  It's a
> long space, about 150ft, and we could very easily have 100 people accessing
> the network at any given time.
>
> Any of the larger spaces out there have insight?  I'm currently looking at
> an internet speed of 50 down/10up or 100 down/15 up.  Also am looking at
> 801.11n routers that have two to three adjustable networks built into the
> device.
>
> Would love some thoughts.
>
> Best,
>
>
>  *Josh Aberson*
> [email protected]
> m: 521.6158 | @JoshAberson
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Coworking" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Coworking" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en.

Reply via email to