so Andras, please decide. Shall I work on trunk or on a branch? Gabor
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:05 AM, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Historically, trunk has been relatively stable -- to the extent there > is incremental development work, it would be in the 1.93_5X series. > Backporting fixes to 1.930X could be off the tag if necessary. > > But what you're taking about isn't minor development work, it's pretty > major. It makes it much harder for anyone else to do incremental > development work without having to understand any changes you've made. > > I guess it's Andreas' call since it's his repo, but I'd much rather > have your work in a branch until it's bulletproof and then merge back > in. > > (Of course, if I had a magic pony, too, I'd have us all migrate to git > and everything could be done in branches and it would "just work".) > > -- David > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Actually as a second thought it would be probably much better to base and >> quick >> release on the previous tag (tags/1.9301/ currently) >> and not on the trunk that might had several other changes as well. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Gabor >> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:28 AM, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Gabor, >>>> >>>> Could you please revert the edits to trunk and do the major surgery on >>>> a branch? Safer if we need to put out 1.930X quickly with a bug fix. >>> >>> sure I can, but Andreas suggested to work on the trunk. >>> >>> Please, let's keep this on the cpan-workers mailing list so others >>> will also see. >>> >>> Gabor >>> >> >
