On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:26:03AM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>
> Therefore I am urging you to think broader and go for:
>
> Policy - short blurb what is this about
> Policy::Org - short sub-blurb what is this about
> Policy::Org::P5P - pumpkin maitaned
> Policy::Org::Toolchain - joint maintainership
> Policy::Project
> Policy::Project::Moose
> Policy::Project::DBIC
> Policy::Author
> Policy::Author::AUTARCH - explicitly reserved (and non-squatable, PAUSE
> admins take action when needed)
> Policy::Author::RIBASUSHI
>
Just thinking that the "Org" intermediate bit is not really needed
(and ugly). The said organizations are big/important enough that they
naturally float above the "Project" level.
So, I suggest the following simplification:
Policy
Policy::P5P - (could be Policy::Perl, and should just link to perlpolicy)
Policy::Toolchain
Policy::Project
Policy::Project::Moose
Policy::Project::DBIC
...
Policy::Author
Policy::Author::AUTARCH
Policy::Author::RIBASUSHI
...
Would documents like David's CONTRIBUTING.mkdn document that he includes in
most of his distributions fit under Policy::Author::DAGOLDEN?
--
Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
Just because you believe it does not make it so.
(Moral from Groo The Wanderer #54 (Epic))
