On 6 May 2015 at 21:08, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) <philippe.bru...@free.fr> wrote:
> Going back to the original proposal, the distrinction between "Org" > and "Project" seems actually minimal. So, the split would really be > between "authors" and "organizations". And actually, Project::Perl and > Project::Toolchain doesn't sound that bad either. > Projects tend to cross-cut the concerns of Orgs. For instance, DBIC and Moose projects are not mutually exclusive with Toolchain. Toolchain for instance will have policies that apply strictly to stuff toolchain authors are involved with , but will still have opinions that are widely applicable to the whole of CPAN, whereas Moose is much finer grained and its opinions are less likely to be consumed by people who aren't specifically working with moose, and Moose maintainers are likely to want to regularly defer to the policies set by toolchain. -- Kent *KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL
