On 05/06/2015 09:26 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
On 05/06/2015 08:03 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
This is something that has bothered me for a while.
We have a lot of standards and guiding principles, but a lot of it is
all in our heads, wisdom one can only get by talking about it on
toolchain, and/or breaking things and getting yelled at.
...
As such, I propose a very rudimentary idea:
Toolchain
This is the top namespace
Toolchain::Standards
First of all +1000 on the idea itself. I want to point out an
alternative to the naming, simply because I have been thinking about
something *very* similar for about 6 months now (and this email may in
fact be the thing that gets me rolling).
I would like to call the thread to refocus itself on the subject at hand
- currently there is just a handful of things people are actually
interested in writing, and really only one (the Toolchain) that is a
collaborative effort.
As such I propose to not dive too deep into the naming of other stuff we
haven't written yet, and focus on how to name the toolchain one alone.
I am fine with both:
Policy::Toolchain
and
Policy::Org::Toolchain
I think Policy::Project::Toolchain is logically inconsistent.
