--
Faustine:
> > > > > I can't see why, when I make a general statement about
> > > > > the importance of not coming across like a paranoid,
> > > > > someone mistakenly thinks I'm referring to him, I
> > > > > explain I wasn't and apologize
James A. Donald:
> > > > But your "apology" presupposed that he, (snip)
Faustine:
> > > No it didn't.
James A. Donald:
> > I notice you deleted the claim that you are supposedly
> > rebutting, and then, as usual, proceeded to rebut an entirely
> > different claim, one that I did not make, and then proceeded
> > to accuse me of saying all manner of stupid things that I did
> > not say.
> >
> > The claim that I made, and that you have conspicuously failed
> > to deny, was that:
> > : : your "apology" presupposed he, (and all who
> > : : disagree with you) to be your inferiors, ignorant,
> > : : and benighted, that we hold foolish views because
> > : : we are ignorant trailer trash blinded by rigid
> > : : ideology,. that if we bothered to check the facts,
> > : : facts you do not bother to research, check, or
> > : : present, we would discover that you were right and
> > : : we are wrong.
Faustine:
> I addressed it with the following:
>
> : : That's an entirely different issue from the other
> : : ones you raised about my beliefs and motivations,
> : : which totally aren't warranted.
I said that your "apology" was an insult. I did not say that you have
insulting beliefs. I do not know, and cannot know, your beliefs and
motivations. I do not believe that you believe what you say, or say
what you believe, so I am disinclined to raise issues about your
beliefs and motivations.
> Unlike you, I never claimed to know what people here know or
> don't know.
You confidently assured us we were ignorant of economics, and
proceeded to produce what you imagined to be evidence of this,
though your "evidence" revealed your own ignorance.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
vYpwoYm8fxy2q1EdCSW1Hu+gSoGw1z1eQQTt/WoR
4dIDJ/LDrxKBk8jmBfuCbDoSMtf5ePJwqB4ermxKB
