thank you for explaining the acronym. since marxists and socialists
believe in communal ownership rather than private ownership, then i
should assume that they are in favor of the Napster position?
norm
Mark Jones wrote:
>
> IPR's are Intellectual Property Rights, the key corporate issue of the day,
> from Napster to Terminator seed technology, about the latter I plan to post.
> But I don't know anything about Napster. I still buy CD's. Yesterday I
> bought a CD of Angelique Kidjo, Miriam Makeba and others called "Queens of
> African Music". I highly recomment this and would even be happy to pay them
> royalties. What the music shows inter alia is the amazing fusion of African
> and Cuban musical traditions: son and salsa sounds -- with East African
> religious and ritual music.
>
> More on IPR's, which is serious stuff, to follow.
>
> Mark
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Norman Mikalac
> > Sent: 09 August 2000 11:04
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [CrashList] The Simultaneous Policy
> >
> >
> > for the noncognoscenti, what's an IPR?
> >
> > thanks for your help.
> >
> > norm
> >
> >
> > Mark Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a big file of stuff on IPR's if anyone is interested, let me know
> > > offlist.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Bunzl
> > > > Sent: 09 August 2000 07:44
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [CrashList] The Simultaneous Policy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Julien,
> > > > There's only one thing for me to say:
> > > > I wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >As far as IPRs are concerned, I am not
> > > > > >aware of any specific proposal on the site.
> > > > You replied:
> > > > >
> > > > > Read your own site better!
> > > > > http://www.simpol.org/section2.html
> > > > > "Further changes including alterations to the financial (debt-money)
> > > > system
> > > > > could also be included along with a complete reappraisal of
> > capitalism's
> > > > > incorrect assumption that natural resources, land and ->intellectual
> > > > property<-
> > > > > should accrue solely to the benefit of their owners.
> > > > > Any such changes would not, however, mean that such
> > resources were to be
> > > > > controlled by the state but that their owners would become
> > trustees of
> > > > those
> > > > > assets on behalf of society as whole."
> > > > >
> > > > My comment:
> > > > Whoops!
> > > >
> > > > All the best
> > > > John.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
> > > > To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
> > > > http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
> > > To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
> > > http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
> > To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
> > http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
> To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
> http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
