>>> "NCFS (Yves Bajard)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/18 5:58 PM
>>>
By the way, Marxism is as irrelevant to rep-sent
circumstances than any
form of liberalism or conservatist capitalism.
There are only two schools of thought that address the key
political issue here, which is the question of how the state
guarantees private property and the right to exploit all
resources, human and natural, to a virtually unlimited
extent. Non-coincidentally both of these alternatives are
communist; they are marxism and anarchism. I think marxism
is the superior of the two, but the point is that without
destroying this system of exploitation based on private
property and guaranteed by the bourgeois nation state, and
finding a way for us to live communally instead, the debate
here lacks any political purpose whatsoever. My
understanding is that the purposes of the list are connected
to a political project that offers some hope for the future
of the planet and its inhabitants. I think that hope arises
from a different way of living, that all people are able to
imagine in principle, but the possibility of which many
refuse to acknowledge.
Tahir
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
