The first order formalization  given in the crm document are:

P14(x,y,z) ⊃ [P14(x,y) ∧ E55(z)]

Note that the predicate on the left hand side has three arguments, which is
more arguments than rdf is comfortable with.

The "in the role of" property is modifying an instance of a "carried out
by" property.
An activity can be carried out by several different agents, each in a
different role, so the property cannot be attached directly to the
activity.

There are several possible ways of representing this using semantic web
tools.

The first approach is to use RDF reification. I am not going to say
anything more about this.

If you are using OWL 2, you can add an annotation each "carried out by"
property assertion.  This is not ideal, as annotations are not really
supposed to be part of the data in the model, and most reasoners ignore
them. They are also not easy to work with in RDF.

A third approach is to define your own class for reification, representing
an instance of a "carrying out" ; this class would have properties relating
the activity, the agent, and the role.

The best approach may be to define a sub property of P14 for each type of
carrying out in a role which is relevant to your model.
You can specify the role associated with all uses of this property using a
property whose subject is the subproperty.

Simon
On Feb 3, 2016 10:01 AM, "Allison Miller" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> I wish to use the CIDOC CRM but need a formal model to do so and have a
> question concerning .1 properties.
>
> eg. E7 Activity has: P14 carried out by (performed): E39 Actor and (P14.1
> in the role of: E55 Type)
>
>
>
> It is a property I need to use - but I can’t work out how to model it!
>
> I thought I could use the Erlangen OWL implementation, but I can’t find
> these properties in it. (That’s not to claim they aren’t there, my
> knowledge of OWL is limited.)
>
> I would welcome any guidance on P14.1, and other .1 properties, in the
> Erlangen implementation, or advice on including them in a definition
> compatible with Semantic Web technologies if anyone has done this.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Alli
>
>
>
> E-mail: [email protected]
>
> Web: www.sysemia.com
>
>
>
>
> Sysemia Limited
>
> The Innovation Centre, Bristol & Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent,
> Emerson's Green, Bristol BS16 7FR
>
> Registered in England and Wales. Company Number: 7555456
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER
>
> Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the
> addressee only, and is confidential and may also be privileged. If you
> receive this message in error, please advise us immediately. If you are not
> the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of distribution,
> copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. Attachments to this e-mail may contain
> software viruses which may damage your systems. Sysemia Ltd have taken
> reasonable steps to minimise this risk, but we advise that any attachments
> are virus checked before they are opened.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>
>

Reply via email to