The scope note and examples of E82 Actor Appellation do not clearly convey
the idea that the appellation must be of a form that is characteristically
an appellation of an actor. This is causing confusion in the user community.

One alternative is to retire E82 altogether and the other is to update the
scope note.

I would vote for deprecation/retirement.

 

I have also suggested a new scope note and changed examples:-


E82 Actor Appellation


Subclass of:         E41 <>  Appellation

 

Scope note:        This class comprises any sort of name, number, code or
symbol characteristically used to identify an E39 Actor. 

 

An E39 Actor will typically have more than one E82 Actor Appellation, and
instances of E82 Actor Appellation in turn may have alternative
representations. The distinction between corporate and personal names, which
is particularly important in library applications, should be made by
explicitly linking the E82 Actor Appellation to an instance of either E21
Person or E74 Group/E40 Legal Body. If this is not possible, the distinction
can be made through the use of the P2 has type mechanism. 

Examples:            

*  “John Doe”

*  “Doe, J”

*  “the U.S. Social Security Number 246-14-2304”

*  “the Artist Formerly Known as Prince”

*  “the Master of the Flemish Madonna”

*  “Raphael’s Workshop”

*  “the Brontë Sisters”

*  “ICOM”

*  “International Council of Museums”

 


E82 Actor Appellation


Subclass of:         E41 <>  Appellation

 

Scope note:        This class comprises any sort of name, number, code or
symbol characteristically used to identify an E39 Actor. That is the very
form of the name indicates that it is an appellation of an instance of E39
Actor.

 

An E39 Actor will typically have more than one E82 Actor Appellation, and
instances of E82 Actor Appellation in turn may have alternative
representations. The distinction between corporate and personal names, which
is particularly important in library applications, should be made by
explicitly linking the E82 Actor Appellation to an instance of either E21
Person or E74 Group/E40 Legal Body. If this is not possible, the distinction
can be made through the use of the P2 has type mechanism. 

Examples:            

*   the U.S. Social Security Number “246-14-2304”

*  UK Company Number “2374216”

*  Leonardo da Vinci’s ULAN identifier “ULAN500010879”

 

Rgds

SdS

 

Stephen Stead

Director

Paveprime Ltd

35 Downs Court Rd

Purley, Surrey 

UK, CR8 1BF

Tel +44 20 8668 3075 

Fax +44 20 8763 1739

Mob +44 7802 755 013

E-mail  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

LinkedIn Profile  <http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads>
http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads

 

Reply via email to