?That is the idea. If there are no other differences there are no need to keep them. As Pat Riva points out many of the subclass should be kept: "So maybe the classes to deprecate would be only these 3: E44- Place Appellation, E75- Conceptual Object Appellation, E82 - Actor Appellation" ?
C-E ________________________________ From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Dominic Oldman <[email protected]> Sent: 04 August 2016 17:57 To: Paul Cripps Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E82 Actor Appellation Issue If an appellation is attached to an actor - isn't it an actor appellation. Likewise if an appellation is attached to a place then isn't it a place appellation? orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-3126<http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-3126> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Paul Cripps <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Just to second Franco, it is important to recognise place names as a specialisation of appellations using E44 as this facilitates links to other place based resources (eg via Ordnance Survey Linked Data URIs) _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
