I also vote for complete removal, together with all others except for
Title, address and coordinates
On 2/8/2016 11:30 πμ, Stephen Stead wrote:
The scope note and examples of E82 Actor Appellation do not clearly
convey the idea that the appellation must be of a form that is
characteristically an appellation of an actor. This is causing
confusion in the user community.
One alternative is to retire E82 altogether and the other is to update
the scope note.
I would vote for deprecation/retirement.
I have also suggested a new scope note and changed examples:-
E82 Actor Appellation
Subclass of: E41 <#_E41_Appellation> Appellation
Scope note: This class comprises any sort of name, number, code
or symbol characteristically used to identify an E39 Actor.
An E39 Actor will typically have more than one E82 Actor Appellation,
and instances of E82 Actor Appellation in turn may have alternative
representations. The distinction between corporate and personal names,
which is particularly important in library applications, should be
made by explicitly linking the E82 Actor Appellation to an instance of
either E21 Person or E74 Group/E40 Legal Body. If this is not
possible, the distinction can be made through the use of the /P2 has
type/ mechanism.
Examples:
§“John Doe”
§“Doe, J”
§“the U.S. Social Security Number 246-14-2304”
§“the Artist Formerly Known as Prince”
§“the Master of the Flemish Madonna”
§“Raphael’s Workshop”
§“the Brontë Sisters”
§“ICOM”
§“International Council of Museums”
E82 Actor Appellation
Subclass of: E41 <#_E41_Appellation> Appellation
Scope note: This class comprises any sort of name, number, code
or symbol characteristically used to identify an E39 Actor. That is
the very form of the name indicates that it is an appellation of an
instance of E39 Actor.
An E39 Actor will typically have more than one E82 Actor Appellation,
and instances of E82 Actor Appellation in turn may have alternative
representations. The distinction between corporate and personal names,
which is particularly important in library applications, should be
made by explicitly linking the E82 Actor Appellation to an instance of
either E21 Person or E74 Group/E40 Legal Body. If this is not
possible, the distinction can be made through the use of the /P2 has
type/ mechanism.
Examples:
§ the U.S. Social Security Number “246-14-2304”
§UK Company Number “2374216”
§Leonardo da Vinci’s ULAN identifier “ULAN500010879”
Rgds
SdS
Stephen Stead
Director
Paveprime Ltd
35 Downs Court Rd
Purley, Surrey
UK, CR8 1BF
Tel +44 20 8668 3075
Fax +44 20 8763 1739
Mob +44 7802 755 013
E-mail [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
LinkedIn Profile http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: [email protected] |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, |
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
