It is problematic to distinguish an “Actor Appellation” from an Appellation in 
general. It entirely depends on cultural knowledge to see a given term as a 
plausible actor appellation or not. And such cultural norms change over time. 
Also with the inclusion in E82 of codes and numbers, the scope is very broad. 
And, even though a term may normally be viewed as an appropriate name for a 
person or corporate body, it may be used to name a thing (Apollo spacecraft) or 
a work (Emma). The function of the appellation is given by the appellation 
relationship, and not by any inherent characteristic of the form of the name or 
term.

Pat

Pat Riva
Associate University Librarian, Collection Services
Concordia University Libraries
Vanier Library (VL-301-61)
7141 Sherbrooke Street West
Montréal, Québec H4B 1R6
Canada
+1-514-848-2424 ext. 5255
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


From: Crm-sig [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dominic Oldman
Sent: August-02-16 7:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] E82 Actor Appellation Issue



I was under the impression from some time ago that this was going to be 
retired. An appellation of an actor entity is an actor appellation and doesnt 
need specialisation.
D




orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-3126<http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-3126>

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Stephen Stead 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The scope note and examples of E82 Actor Appellation do not clearly convey the 
idea that the appellation must be of a form that is characteristically an 
appellation of an actor. This is causing confusion in the user community.
One alternative is to retire E82 altogether and the other is to update the 
scope note.
I would vote for deprecation/retirement.

I have also suggested a new scope note and changed examples:-
E82 Actor Appellation
Subclass of:         E41 Appellation

Scope note:        This class comprises any sort of name, number, code or 
symbol characteristically used to identify an E39 Actor.

An E39 Actor will typically have more than one E82 Actor Appellation, and 
instances of E82 Actor Appellation in turn may have alternative 
representations. The distinction between corporate and personal names, which is 
particularly important in library applications, should be made by explicitly 
linking the E82 Actor Appellation to an instance of either E21 Person or E74 
Group/E40 Legal Body. If this is not possible, the distinction can be made 
through the use of the P2 has type mechanism.
Examples:
•  “John Doe”
•  “Doe, J”
•  “the U.S. Social Security Number 246-14-2304”
•  “the Artist Formerly Known as Prince”
•  “the Master of the Flemish Madonna”
•  “Raphael’s Workshop”
•  “the Brontë Sisters”
•  “ICOM”
•  “International Council of Museums”

E82 Actor Appellation
Subclass of:         E41 Appellation

Scope note:        This class comprises any sort of name, number, code or 
symbol characteristically used to identify an E39 Actor. That is the very form 
of the name indicates that it is an appellation of an instance of E39 Actor.

An E39 Actor will typically have more than one E82 Actor Appellation, and 
instances of E82 Actor Appellation in turn may have alternative 
representations. The distinction between corporate and personal names, which is 
particularly important in library applications, should be made by explicitly 
linking the E82 Actor Appellation to an instance of either E21 Person or E74 
Group/E40 Legal Body. If this is not possible, the distinction can be made 
through the use of the P2 has type mechanism.
Examples:
•   the U.S. Social Security Number “246-14-2304”
•  UK Company Number “2374216”
•  Leonardo da Vinci’s ULAN identifier “ULAN500010879”

Rgds
SdS

Stephen Stead
Director
Paveprime Ltd
35 Downs Court Rd
Purley, Surrey
UK, CR8 1BF
Tel +44 20 8668 3075<tel:%2B44%2020%208668%203075>
Fax +44 20 8763 1739<tel:%2B44%2020%208763%201739>
Mob +44 7802 755 013<tel:%2B44%207802%20755%20013>
E-mail [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
LinkedIn Profile http://uk.linkedin.com/in/steads


_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to