Dear All,
I propose a new property of Symbolic Object : "has symbolic content :
String" , in RDFS subproperty of rdfs:value.
The "level of symbolic specificity" by which the String is interpreted
should conform to the type of the Symbolic Object.
Best,
Martin
On 9/14/2018 7:54 PM, Richard Light wrote:
On 13/09/2018 20:57, Martin Doerr wrote:
Dear Richard,
What we need, to my opinion, is a property of Symbolic Object we
may call it "has symbolic content" or "has symbolic content inline"
or anything better, which defines that the symbolic content *is
identical to* the Literal, *abstracted *to the "level of symbolic
specificity" that the Literal implies and that conforms to the
identity condition of the Symbolic Object, i.e., characters of a
certain script, or whatever. That would make the meaning of the
"value" unambiguous.
Again, I'm in complete agreement with this line of thought. One
decision we should make is whether this property forms part of the
generic CRM framework, or if it is to be an implementation-specific
property which only appears in our RDF implementation of the CRM.
My instinct is for it to go into the CRM proper: the treatment of
Symbolic Object and its subclasses would I think be made clearer by
the addition of this property.
For CRM proper!
OK: perhaps we should start a new issue to address this?
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: [email protected] |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, |
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
