Dear Martin, 

I can confirm that having symbolic content as subclass of rdf:value would 
incredibly help!!

Best, 

Nicola










> On 17 Sep 2018, at 21:38, Robert Sanderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> Examples I have a lot of!
>  
>  
> How about …
>  
> * The materials description (E33) of the painting (E22)  _has symbolic 
> content_ “Oil, French Watercolors on Paper, Graphite and Ink on Canvas, with 
> an Oak frame.”
> * The title (E35) of Einstein’s 1915 text (E73) _has symbolic content_ 
> “Relativity, the Special and the General Theory“
> * The story of Little Red Riding Hood (E33) _has symbolic content_ “Once upon 
> a time there lived in a certain village …”
> * The inscription (E34) on Rijksmuseum object SK-A-1601 (E22) _has symbolic 
> content_ “B”
>    
> Rob
>  
>  
> From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Richard Light 
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, September 17, 2018 at 12:09 PM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: symbolic content
>  
> Rob,
> 
> Absolutely.  So now we need to draft the text to describe this property, in 
> suitably generalized terms, for the CRM, and then update our RDF 
> documentation to say exactly how it is to be used in that context.  Perhaps 
> we should start with some examples?
> 
> Richard
> 
> On 17/09/2018 19:49, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> 
>  
> Thank you, Martin! I think this is exactly what we need ☺
>  
> Rob
>  
> From: Crm-sig <[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of Martin Doerr 
> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, September 14, 2018 at 10:23 AM
> To: "[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: symbolic content
>  
> Dear All,
> 
> I propose a new property of Symbolic Object : "has symbolic content : String" 
> , in RDFS subproperty of rdfs:value.
> 
> The "level of symbolic specificity" by which the String is interpreted should 
> conform to the type of the Symbolic Object.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 9/14/2018 7:54 PM, Richard Light wrote:
>  
> On 13/09/2018 20:57, Martin Doerr wrote:
> Dear Richard,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> What we need, to my opinion, is a property of Symbolic Object we may call it 
> "has symbolic content" or "has symbolic content inline" or anything better, 
> which defines that the symbolic content is identical to the Literal, 
> abstracted to the "level of symbolic specificity" that the Literal implies 
> and that conforms to the identity condition of the Symbolic Object, i.e., 
> characters of a certain script, or whatever. That would make the meaning of 
> the "value" unambiguous.
> Again, I'm in complete agreement with this line of thought.  One decision we 
> should make is whether this property forms part of the generic CRM framework, 
> or if it is to be an implementation-specific property which only appears in 
> our RDF implementation of the CRM.  My instinct is for it to go into the CRM 
> proper: the treatment of Symbolic Object and its subclasses would I think be 
> made clearer by the addition of this property.
> For CRM proper!
> OK: perhaps we should start a new issue to address this?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>  Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
>  Research Director             |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
>                                |  Email: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> |
>                                                              |        
>                Center for Cultural Informatics               |
>                Information Systems Laboratory                |
>                 Institute of Computer Science                |
>    Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
>                                                              |
>                N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,             |
>                 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece               |
>                                                              |
>              Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl 
> <http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl>           |
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig 
> <http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>
>  
> -- 
> Richard Light
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to