Dear Martin,

The new note scope looks great. My only doubt concerns the English adjective 
"adjacent” which seems to indicate only proximity relationships in a linear 
sense but not in a vertical one, in the case of overlapping elements.

For completeness I would write "adjacent or superposed".

I also think we need to put a hypen between earthqyake and induced: 
"earthquake-induced”.

But native English speakers will certainly be more specific than me :-)

The rest seems perfect to me.

Ciao,
Achille

> Il giorno 26 feb 2021, alle ore 21:54, Martin Doerr <[email protected]> ha 
> scritto:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Here my comprehensive proposal for AP11, changes in yellow:
> 
> OLD
> AP11 has physical relation (is physical relation of)
> Domain:              A8 <x-msg://11/#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit> Stratigraphic 
> Unit
> Range:                A8 <x-msg://11/#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit> Stratigraphic 
> Unit
> Quantification:    one to many (0,n:0,1)
>  
> Scope note:      This property identifies the physical relationship between 
> two A8 Stratigraphic Units. The type of physical         relationships found 
> between stratigraphic units in archaeological documentation is documented 
> through the property AP 11.1 has type
>  
> Example          The layer of burned remains of the log building (in Søndre 
> gate, Trondheim, Norway) (A8) has physical relation (is physical relation of) 
> under the foundation of the church of St. Clements (A8).
> In First Order Logic:
> AP11(x,y) ⊃ A8(x)
> AP11(x,y) ⊃ A8 (y)
> AP11.1 (x,y,z) ⊃ [AP11 (x,y) ∧ E55(z)]
> 
> Properties:                        AP11.1 has type: E55 
> <x-msg://11/#_E55_Type> Type
> NEW
> AP11 has physical relation to (is physically related by)
> Domain:              A8 <x-msg://11/#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit> Stratigraphic 
> Unit
> Range:                A8 <x-msg://11/#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit> Stratigraphic 
> Unit
> Quantification:    many to many (0,n:0,n)
>  
> Scope note:      This property identifies the physical relationship between 
> two A8 Stratigraphic Units. The described relationship may be between two 
> adjacent instances of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit sharing a common interface 
> (instance of A3 Stratigraphic Interface), between an instance of A2 
> Stratigraphic Volume Unit and one of its adjacent interfaces, such as 
> human-made cuts or earthquake induced faults, or even between two 
> intersecting interfaces.
>  
> The type of physical relationships found between stratigraphic units in 
> archaeological or geological documentation is documented through the property 
> AP 11.1 has type. The type of physical relationship typically constitutes 
> strong evidence for the sequence of genesis of the related stratigraphic 
> units, which can be documented by the property AP13 has stratigraphic 
> relation to (is stratigraphically related by). The type may either pertain to 
> a relative topology, such as the one being “under” the other, or to the 
> fine-structure of the interface between them, such as a layer of concrete 
> having filled out earlier micro-cavities in various directions in the 
> interface before solidifying.
>  
> Examples         The layer of burned remains of the log building (in Søndre 
> gate, Trondheim, Norway) (A8) has physical relation the foundation of the 
> church of St. Clements (A8) has type is under (E55)
>  
> The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) has physical 
> relation to wall C (A8) has type runs up to (E55). [as observed initally, see 
> below] (Hodder 1999)
>  
> The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) has physical 
> relation to wall C (A8) has type a wall-slot cut for (E55). [as observed 
> finally, see below] (Hodder 1999)
>  
> The wall C of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) has physical relation 
> to wall D (A8) has type abuts on (E55). (Hodder 1999)
>  
> The wall D of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) has physical relation 
> to the floors B’ (A8) has type on top of (E55). (Hodder 1999)
>  
> In First Order Logic:
> AP11(x,y) ⊃ A8(x)
> AP11(x,y) ⊃ A8 (y)
> AP11.1 (x,y,z) ⊃ [AP11 (x,y) ∧ E55(z)]
> Properties:                        AP11.1 has type: E55 
> <x-msg://11/#_E55_Type> Type
> 
> Best,
> 
> Martin 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------
>  Dr. Martin Doerr
>               
>  Honorary Head of the                                                         
>           
>  Center for Cultural Informatics
>  
>  Information Systems Laboratory  
>  Institute of Computer Science             
>  Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   
>                   
>  N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,         
>  GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece 
>  
>  Vox:+30(2810)391625  
>  Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
>  Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl 
> <http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl>_______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Reply via email to