Dear All,
Here my comprehensive proposal for AP11, changes in yellow:
*
OLD*
*AP11 has physical relation (is physical relation of)***
Domain:A8 <#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit>Stratigraphic Unit
Range:A8 <#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit>Stratigraphic Unit
Quantification:one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:This property identifies the physical relationship between
two A8 Stratigraphic Units. The type of physical relationships found
between stratigraphic units in archaeological documentation is
documented through the property AP 11.1 has type
ExampleThe layer of burned remains of the log building (in Søndre gate,
Trondheim, Norway) (A8) /has physical relation (is physical relation of)
under /the foundation of the church of St. Clements (A8).
In First Order Logic:
AP11(x,y) ⊃A8(x)
AP11(x,y) ⊃A8 (y)
AP11.1 (x,y,z) ⊃[AP11 (x,y) ∧E55(z)]
Properties:_AP_11.1 has type: E55 <#_E55_Type> Type
*NEW*
*AP11 has physical relation to (is physically related by)*
Domain:A8 <#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit>Stratigraphic Unit
Range:A8 <#_A8_Stratigraphic_Unit>Stratigraphic Unit
Quantification:many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:This property identifies the physical relationship between
two A8 Stratigraphic Units. The described relationship may be between
two adjacent instances of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit sharing a common
interface (instance of A3 Stratigraphic Interface), between an instance
of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit and one of its adjacent interfaces, such
as human-made cuts or earthquake induced faults, or even between two
intersecting interfaces.
The type of physical relationships found between stratigraphic units in
archaeological or geological documentation is documented through the
property AP 11.1 has type. The type of physical relationship typically
constitutes strong evidence for the sequence of genesis of the related
stratigraphic units, which can be documented by the property AP13 /has
stratigraphic relation to (is stratigraphically related by)./ The type
may either pertain to a relative topology, such as the one being “under”
the other, or to the fine-structure of the interface between them, such
as a layer of concrete having filled out earlier micro-cavities in
various directions in the interface before solidifying.
ExamplesThe layer of burned remains of the log building (in Søndre gate,
Trondheim, Norway) (A8) /has physical relation /the foundation of the
church of St. Clements (A8)/has type/is under (E55)
The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has
physical relation to/ wall C (A8) /has type/ runs up to (E55). [as
observed initally, see below] (Hodder 1999)
The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has
physical relation to/ wall C (A8) /has type/ a wall-slot cut for (E55).
[as observed finally, see below] (Hodder 1999)
The wall C of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has physical
relation to/ wall D (A8) /has type/ abuts on (E55). (Hodder 1999)
The wall D of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has physical
relation to/ the floors B’ (A8) /has type/ on top of (E55). (Hodder 1999)
In First Order Logic:
AP11(x,y) ⊃A8(x)
AP11(x,y) ⊃A8 (y)
AP11.1 (x,y,z) ⊃[AP11 (x,y) ∧E55(z)]
Properties:_AP_11.1 has type: E55 <#_E55_Type> Type
*
*
Best,
Martin**
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
