Hi The suggested sentence
" The described relationship may be between two adjacent instances of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit sharing a common interface (instance of A3 Stratigraphic Interface), between an instance of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit and one of its adjacent interfaces, such as human-made cuts or earthquake induced faults, or even between two intersecting interfaces" is somewhat long. A11 is relating two instances of A8. My concern is the verb "may". Is this meant as "limited to" or "may be but is not limited to"? Best, Christian-Emil ________________________________ From: Crm-sig <crm-sig-boun...@ics.forth.gr> on behalf of Achille Felicetti <achille.felice...@pin.unifi.it> Sent: 26 February 2021 22:39 To: Martin Doerr Cc: crm-sig Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 474, scope note of AP11 Dear Martin, The new note scope looks great. My only doubt concerns the English adjective "adjacent” which seems to indicate only proximity relationships in a linear sense but not in a vertical one, in the case of overlapping elements. For completeness I would write "adjacent or superposed". I also think we need to put a hypen between earthqyake and induced: "earthquake-induced”. But native English speakers will certainly be more specific than me :-) The rest seems perfect to me. Ciao, Achille Il giorno 26 feb 2021, alle ore 21:54, Martin Doerr <mar...@ics.forth.gr<mailto:mar...@ics.forth.gr>> ha scritto: Dear All, Here my comprehensive proposal for AP11, changes in yellow: OLD AP11 has physical relation (is physical relation of) Domain: A8 Stratigraphic Unit Range: A8 Stratigraphic Unit Quantification: one to many (0,n:0,1) Scope note: This property identifies the physical relationship between two A8 Stratigraphic Units. The type of physical relationships found between stratigraphic units in archaeological documentation is documented through the property AP 11.1 has type Example The layer of burned remains of the log building (in Søndre gate, Trondheim, Norway) (A8) has physical relation (is physical relation of) under the foundation of the church of St. Clements (A8). In First Order Logic: AP11(x,y) ⊃ A8(x) AP11(x,y) ⊃ A8 (y) AP11.1 (x,y,z) ⊃ [AP11 (x,y) ∧ E55(z)] Properties: AP11.1 has type: E55 Type NEW AP11 has physical relation to (is physically related by) Domain: A8 Stratigraphic Unit Range: A8 Stratigraphic Unit Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n) Scope note: This property identifies the physical relationship between two A8 Stratigraphic Units. The described relationship may be between two adjacent instances of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit sharing a common interface (instance of A3 Stratigraphic Interface), between an instance of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit and one of its adjacent interfaces, such as human-made cuts or earthquake induced faults, or even between two intersecting interfaces. The type of physical relationships found between stratigraphic units in archaeological or geological documentation is documented through the property AP 11.1 has type. The type of physical relationship typically constitutes strong evidence for the sequence of genesis of the related stratigraphic units, which can be documented by the property AP13 has stratigraphic relation to (is stratigraphically related by). The type may either pertain to a relative topology, such as the one being “under” the other, or to the fine-structure of the interface between them, such as a layer of concrete having filled out earlier micro-cavities in various directions in the interface before solidifying. Examples The layer of burned remains of the log building (in Søndre gate, Trondheim, Norway) (A8) has physical relation the foundation of the church of St. Clements (A8) has type is under (E55) The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) has physical relation to wall C (A8) has type runs up to (E55). [as observed initally, see below] (Hodder 1999) The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) has physical relation to wall C (A8) has type a wall-slot cut for (E55). [as observed finally, see below] (Hodder 1999) The wall C of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) has physical relation to wall D (A8) has type abuts on (E55). (Hodder 1999) The wall D of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) has physical relation to the floors B’ (A8) has type on top of (E55). (Hodder 1999) In First Order Logic: AP11(x,y) ⊃ A8(x) AP11(x,y) ⊃ A8 (y) AP11.1 (x,y,z) ⊃ [AP11 (x,y) ∧ E55(z)] Properties: AP11.1 has type: E55 Type Best, Martin -- ------------------------------------ Dr. Martin Doerr Honorary Head of the Center for Cultural Informatics Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece Vox:+30(2810)391625 Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr<mailto:mar...@ics.forth.gr> Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl _______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr<mailto:Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
