Hi Christian-Emil,
Indeed, to be discussed. My opinion is, that this is an exclusive list
of possibilities. Either or or. If this is linguistically correct or can
be improved, should be answered by native English speakers. If it is
archaeologically correct, by archaeologists, including you. My opinion
is that non-adjacent units should be excluded. There is, however, a
question of sub- and superlayers. This is a logical problem.
Earthquake faults are interesting features. They may cut through many
layers, showing how after the cut the sequence continues dislocated.
Best,
Martin
On 2/27/2021 10:09 AM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore wrote:
Hi
The suggested sentence
" The described relationship may be between two adjacent instances of
A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit sharing a common interface (instance of
A3 Stratigraphic Interface), between an instance of A2 Stratigraphic
Volume Unit and one of its adjacent interfaces, such as human-made
cuts or earthquake induced faults, or even between two intersecting
interfaces"
is somewhat long. A11 is relating two instances of A8. My concern is
the verb "may". Is this meant as "limited to" or "may be but is not
limited to"?
Best,
Christian-Emil
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Achille
Felicetti <[email protected]>
*Sent:* 26 February 2021 22:39
*To:* Martin Doerr
*Cc:* crm-sig
*Subject:* Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 474, scope note of AP11
Dear Martin,
The new note scope looks great. My only doubt concerns the English
adjective "adjacent” which seems to indicate only proximity
relationships in a linear sense but not in a vertical one, in the case
of overlapping elements.
For completeness I would write "adjacent or superposed".
I also think we need to put a hypen between earthqyake and induced:
"earthquake-induced”.
But native English speakers will certainly be more specific than me :-)
The rest seems perfect to me.
Ciao,
Achille
Il giorno 26 feb 2021, alle ore 21:54, Martin Doerr
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:
Dear All,
Here my comprehensive proposal for AP11, changes in yellow:
*
OLD*
*AP11 has physical relation (is physical relation of)***
Domain:A8Stratigraphic Unit
Range:A8Stratigraphic Unit
Quantification:one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:This property identifies the physical relationship between
two A8 Stratigraphic Units. The type of physical relationships found
between stratigraphic units in archaeological documentation is
documented through the property AP 11.1 has type
ExampleThe layer of burned remains of the log building (in Søndre
gate, Trondheim, Norway) (A8) /has physical relation (is physical
relation of) under /the foundation of the church of St. Clements (A8).
In First Order Logic:
AP11(x,y) ⊃A8(x)
AP11(x,y) ⊃A8 (y)
AP11.1 (x,y,z) ⊃[AP11 (x,y) ∧E55(z)]
Properties:_AP_11.1 has type: E55 Type
*NEW*
*AP11 has physical relation to (is physically related by)*
Domain:A8Stratigraphic Unit
Range:A8Stratigraphic Unit
Quantification:many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:This property identifies the physical relationship between
two A8 Stratigraphic Units. The described relationship may be between
two adjacent instances of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit sharing a
common interface (instance of A3 Stratigraphic Interface), between an
instance of A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit and one of its adjacent
interfaces, such as human-made cuts or earthquake induced faults, or
even between two intersecting interfaces.
The type of physical relationships found between stratigraphic units
in archaeological or geological documentation is documented through
the property AP 11.1 has type. The type of physical relationship
typically constitutes strong evidence for the sequence of genesis of
the related stratigraphic units, which can be documented by the
property AP13 /has stratigraphic relation to (is stratigraphically
related by)./ The type may either pertain to a relative topology,
such as the one being “under” the other, or to the fine-structure of
the interface between them, such as a layer of concrete having filled
out earlier micro-cavities in various directions in the interface
before solidifying.
ExamplesThe layer of burned remains of the log building (in Søndre
gate, Trondheim, Norway) (A8) /has physical relation /the foundation
of the church of St. Clements (A8)/has type/is under (E55)
The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has
physical relation to/ wall C (A8) /has type/ runs up to (E55). [as
observed initally, see below] (Hodder 1999)
The floors at B of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has
physical relation to/ wall C (A8) /has type/ a wall-slot cut for
(E55). [as observed finally, see below] (Hodder 1999)
The wall C of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has physical
relation to/ wall D (A8) /has type/ abuts on (E55). (Hodder 1999)
The wall D of the building 1 in Çatalhöyük, Turkey (A8) /has physical
relation to/ the floors B’ (A8) /has type/ on top of (E55). (Hodder 1999)
In First Order Logic:
AP11(x,y) ⊃A8(x)
AP11(x,y) ⊃A8 (y)
AP11.1 (x,y,z) ⊃[AP11 (x,y) ∧E55(z)]
Properties:_AP_11.1 has type: E55 Type
*
*
Best,
Martin**
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email:[email protected]
Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
