Thank you Erin. We are using Zotero already for the CRM so this is a
good idea. I can check if a new folder can be created for issue 530.
T.
On 08/03/2021 19:01, Erin Canning wrote:
I would also like to be involved in this discussion, please! I too have
a reading list on the subject that I would be happy to share; I have
been meaning to pull everything into a Zotero library and this is a good
excuse to do so. For a single article to start things off, I would
recommend Miriam Posner's "What's Next: The Radical, Unrealized
Potential of the Digital Humanities"
<https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled/section/a22aca14-0eb0-4cc6-a622-6fee9428a357>
as an interesting read.
Best,
Erin
Erin Canning
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Ontology Systems Analyst, LINCS
https://lincsproject.ca/<https://lincsproject.ca/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Crm-sig <[email protected]> on behalf of Athanasios
Velios via Crm-sig <[email protected]>
*Sent:* March 8, 2021 12:52 PM
*To:* crm-sig <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [Crm-sig] Issue:530 Bias in the CRM
EXTERNAL EMAIL:
Fantastic! Thank you for sharing and you are first in the list.
For the rest in list and if you did not attend today's sessions,
following discussion for issue 530, a working group is being formed to
discuss bias in the CRM. Please let me know if you wish to contribute to
the discussion.
All the best,
Thanasis
On 08/03/2021 17:17, Anaïs Guillem wrote:
Dear Thanasis, all,
Some digital humanists work and publish on this question of bias in
digital humanities: here is an example of very a propos publication:
https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425
<https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425>
<https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425
<https://journals.dartmouth.edu/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Journals.woa/xmlpage/4/article/425>>
I gathered myself bibliography about decolonizing knowledge and
methodology especially in digital project. I could join the discussion
of your working group if you want.
Cheers,
Anais
Le mer. 3 mars 2021 à 14:58, Athanasios Velios <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> a écrit :
Dear all,
In version 7.1 a short but important sentence has been added at the end
of the scope section:
"Discussions on the types of bias present in the CIDOC CRM are in
progress within the CIDOC CRM community."
Issue 530 is used to track the discussions here:
http://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-530-bias-in-data-structure
<http://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-530-bias-in-data-structure>
<http://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-530-bias-in-data-structure
<http://cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-530-bias-in-data-structure>>
It is important to engage in this discussion so that we first understand
the issues around bias and privileged positions and then how these may
or may not impact the development of the model.
We will then be more confident in making a more complete statement is
future versions. Issue 530 is scheduled to be discussed at the community
session of the forthcoming meeting.
Looking forward to it.
All the best,
Thanasis
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>>
--
Anaïs Guillem
Architect-archaeologist
+33 630005089
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
<http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig>
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
