On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Matthew Ahrens wrote: > How do we get 4% faster when running on the same endianness as the fs was > created on? (created on x86, run on amd64) Where are the bulk of the calls > to BSWAP_* happening in that case? > --matt
I've been wondering that too--this is just black box testing. I may have to look at the code. I've been setting up a retest that eliminates process overhead (see thread discussion) and disk read overhead (by running on swapfs). -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
