On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Ferenc Rakoczi wrote: > The changes look good. For the > SPARC version, the '& 0xff000000' part for the > 32-bit version and the '& 0xff00000000000000ULL' > for the 64-bit version and the '& 0xff' for both > versions can be omitted (though I think at -xO3 > or greater level of optimization the compiler will > not emit any instruction for those anyways).
Great idea--I removed those masks. > Just out of curiosity, what type of processor was > used for the SPARC results on your spreadsheet? > Thanks, > Ferenc thrace.sfbay: sun4u, Sun Fire V120, UltraSPARC-IIe (648 MHz), 1GB memory Not fast or new, but I don't have to worry about anyone else wanting to use it. It shouldn't be used for comparison with x86, just a before/after comparison with itself. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
