>> * Run this command on ZFS filesystem: find . -exec ls -l {} \; >/dev/null
> Shouldn't this be '+' instead of ';' to avoid being dominated by the
> fork+exec time? I find it extremely impressive that you are still getting a
> 3% improvement with all these forkexecs going on.
I'll try that.
>> http://dan.drydog.com/reviews/6729208-bswap3-opt-chart.png
> Nice. Is the second EM64T32b a typo for 64b?
It should be "EM64T 32b" which means 32-bit object running on the 64-bit Intel
EM64T processor. The other possibilities are:
AMD64 32b: 32-bit object running on AMD64.
AMD64 64b: 64-bit object running on AMD64.
EM64T 64b: 64-bit object running on Intel EM64T.
> Strange that you are getting a couple regressions in the last chart, but they
> look negligible.
I think it's just noise.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
