Nikos, JT -- On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <n...@gnutls.org> wrote: > I was under the impression the latest openssl included quite a decent > eng_cryptodev.c, but as I understand from your mail it doesn't.
It's my experience that openssl-1.0.1e works fine with linux-cryptodev 1.6 on x86-64 (very modern linux kernel, 3.8.something -- basically fully up-to-date fedora 18 x86-64 box here). I'm only using it for signing and encrypting, though, not SSL/TLS communications. I can't get a similar combination (openssl 1.0.1e, cryptodev-linux 1.6, linux 3.4.36) to work on my ppc32 target though, due to too-large work units to the security coprocessor. I sent a bug about that a few weeks ago, although it might have gotten lost in moderation. Not sure who has the responsibility for breaking down work into small-enough chunks (the Freescale SEC is limited to 2^16-1 bytes at a time), and don't have the bandwidth right now to pursue it myself. Original report here: https://mail.gna.org/public/cryptodev-linux-devel/2013-04/msg00009.html Best regards, Anthony Foiani _______________________________________________ Cryptodev-linux-devel mailing list Cryptodev-linux-devel@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/cryptodev-linux-devel
