On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Anthony Foiani <anthony.foi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nikos, JT -- > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos > <n...@gnutls.org> wrote: >> I was under the impression the latest openssl included quite a decent >> eng_cryptodev.c, but as I understand from your mail it doesn't. > It's my experience that openssl-1.0.1e works fine with linux-cryptodev > 1.6 on x86-64 (very modern linux kernel, 3.8.something -- basically > fully up-to-date fedora 18 x86-64 box here). I'm only using it for > signing and encrypting, though, not SSL/TLS communications. > I can't get a similar combination (openssl 1.0.1e, cryptodev-linux > 1.6, linux 3.4.36) to work on my ppc32 target though, due to too-large > work units to the security coprocessor. I sent a bug about that a few > weeks ago, although it might have gotten lost in moderation. Not sure > who has the responsibility for breaking down work into small-enough > chunks (the Freescale SEC is limited to 2^16-1 bytes at a time), and > don't have the bandwidth right now to pursue it myself. Original > report here:
Hello Anthony, So if I understand correctly that was a driver issue that has now been solved in 3.8, or the problem still persists? Cryptodev could work-around driver issues if needed but if the problem is already solved in 3.8 I don't think that there is any need for action. We may need to document the issue though. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ Cryptodev-linux-devel mailing list Cryptodev-linux-devel@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/cryptodev-linux-devel
