On 2013-06-29, at 11:48 PM, Jacob Appelbaum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Natanael: >> I'm not seeing that many options though. The Phantom project died pretty >> fast; >> https://code.google.com/p/phantom/ >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/phantom-protocol >> http://phantom-anon.blogspot.se/ >> >> So who's out there developing any useful protocols for anonymization today? >> *Anybody*? Could we try to start a new project (if needed) to create one? >> (I would like one with at least the same level of functionality as I2P, >> even if it would have to have a very different architecture.) > > I guess you might be interested in this project called Tor? A few of us > have spent a decade working on it: > > https://www.torproject.org/ There should be a disclaimer somewhere that Tor is a competitor to I2P, is far from perfect itself (actually has a few glaring weaknesses, such as exit nodes), and the guy critiquing I2P works for Tor. I'm a Tor supporter personally, but those things should be clarified! NK > > I'd suggest if you want to experiment with Tor and i2p, to try Tails: > > https://tails.boum.org > > All the best, > Jacob > > _______________________________________________ > cryptography mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list [email protected] http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
