We need to change Simon and Speck to align with the algorithmic description
provided by the Simon and Speck team. Formerly, we followed the team's test
vectors, but they turned out to be wrong. Ugh...
We are tracking the issue at
Simon and Speck have been part of the library for about 30 days. I think we
can make the change without providing a 2nd set of classes with former
behavior. "Former behavior" means the existing incorrect behavior. That is
assuming no one is using them at this moment.
My question is, is it OK to make the change without providing the second
set of classes?
You received this message because you are subscribed to "Crypto++ Users". More
information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.