On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 8:57:46 PM UTC-5, Mouse wrote:
>
> I believe the answer is yes. The initial implementation was not correct, 
> this update fixes the problem. 
>
> I say - if nobody gives a good reason why the incorrect behavior should be 
> offered (even upon request), no need to bother.
>

Ack, thanks.

As an intermediate step I think we should pull Simon and Speck until we get 
things sorted out. At this point in time our implementation has the 
potential to do harm.

Jeff 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to "Crypto++ Users". More 
information about Crypto++ and this group is available at 
http://www.cryptopp.com and 
http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cryptopp-users.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to cryptopp-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to