On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 8:57:46 PM UTC-5, Mouse wrote:
> I believe the answer is yes. The initial implementation was not correct,
> this update fixes the problem.
> I say - if nobody gives a good reason why the incorrect behavior should be
> offered (even upon request), no need to bother.
As an intermediate step I think we should pull Simon and Speck until we get
things sorted out. At this point in time our implementation has the
potential to do harm.
You received this message because you are subscribed to "Crypto++ Users". More
information about Crypto++ and this group is available at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Crypto++ Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.