On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 at 8:57:46 PM UTC-5, Mouse wrote: > > I believe the answer is yes. The initial implementation was not correct, > this update fixes the problem. > > I say - if nobody gives a good reason why the incorrect behavior should be > offered (even upon request), no need to bother. >
Ack, thanks. As an intermediate step I think we should pull Simon and Speck until we get things sorted out. At this point in time our implementation has the potential to do harm. Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "Crypto++ Users". More information about Crypto++ and this group is available at http://www.cryptopp.com and http://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/cryptopp-users. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Crypto++ Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
