Quoting Chris Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > By "a lot slower", we mean several order of magnitude slower. In my > > own tests, I found that a commit operation which took under a minute > > with CVS took perhaps 40 minutes with SVN. Marten also conducted > > tests and reported that he finally aborted an SVN commit after it hit > > the 1 hour mark. > > > > > Wow, that's almost impressive, if you're going for rediculous. How long ago > was this? We started using SVN a year ago, and we have some large model > files (several megs), and out entire 94 meg gamedata directory only takes me > about five minutes to checkout. That's on a server running off my home cable > modem, while I'm on my campus network which limits wireless to 60k/s.
This was hm, about a year or a year and a half ago. A full checkout of CS (which is ~150MB) took not too long (8 minutes or so), but the killers where big commits. > Commits of sweeping changed to takt directory have taken upwards of ten > minutes, but most certainly never any more that that. So, if there is a huge > slow down, I'd would most certainly like to help investigate why this is, > and report it as a bug to Subversion, since it most certainly is not the > typical case for a subversion repository. Most commits where 1-2 times slower, but the 1h+ commit was a crazy test changing every "ab" in CS to "cd" (changes to a few thousand files) I think we should rerun tests with current CVS and SF SVN before saying yay or nay though... -Marten ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
