On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:09:54 -0500 Eric Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We tried SVN some time ago for CS and found it to be a LOT slower. > > By "a lot slower", we mean several order of magnitude slower. This is a known limitation of current SVN implementation. We've reported about it and fix is in the progress. Who knows when it will be fixed. Especially the problem is with use of svn propset command. We (ScummVM project) were selected as one of betatesters of new SVN facility. So we migrated to SVN, but we did much more than plain conversion. I described whole process here: http://wiki.scummvm.org/index.php/CVS2SVN So far, besides slow commits sometimes, overall impression is really good. To avoid big commit times as a temporary workaround we found useful to commit by parts, i.e. select smaller subtrees in project tree and run svn commit separately if there are too many changes. Size of our CVS repository was comparable to yours, but I remember how you were requested to clean it up and remove autogenerated doxygen documentation several years ago. Also see some pros/cons of such conversion here: http://wiki.scummvm.org/index.php/CVS_vs_SVN I hope this will be helpful to you. Eugene ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Crystal-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crystal-main Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
