I don't think they're official. They're just saying that to get traffic. On Sep 1, 2012 2:31 PM, "Nick Emson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Seems as good a place as any to again highlight the success of valve > outsourcing their “official” servers to third parties. This time an issue > with “Pinion White Label”.**** > > ** ** > > This provider seems to be running an “all maps” map group (or at least the > wrong map group) for their demolition and arms race servers. Every time I > go through official matchmaking for these game modes I end up on their UK > or EU servers on god damn inferno, nuke, office… every time.**** > > ** ** > > Now I realise some people will approve of this customisation, but as an > “official” server providing an expected vanilla experience, this is poor. > Selecting the desired map group in the matchmaking “find a game” screen is > thus rendered meaningless.**** > > ** ** > > I previously highlighted one provider operating faulty servers (which was > rectified, thanks), now we have another customising or unable to configure > theirs.**** > > ** ** > > This adds fuel to the fire on questioning why some providers are being > allowed to operate “official” servers when they are effectively the same as > our community ones (tweaks, flaws and all). And particularly why as a > result we have to have a 2-tier matchmaking system, one of which likely > never gets used as much and allows no control over what game type you will > land on.**** > > ** ** > > Can someone at Pinion (if on this list) rectify, or Valve get on the case > with monitoring your providers more closely?**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > Nick**** > > _______________________________________________ > Csgo_servers mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers >
_______________________________________________ Csgo_servers mailing list [email protected] https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
