Norman Fournier wrote:
> Try using XHTML, which is cleaner markup, with this doctype: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> Unfortunately this would introduce a further complication, in that the content should then be served with MIME-type application/xhtml+xml However, if you do this, then at least one major browser will fail to handle it properly. Thus, as others have already said, you would do better to use one of the three HTML 4.01 variants (strict, transitional or frameset : the last is irrelevant in this context), and whilst the purist in me would advocate "strict", a more pragmatic person might recommend transitional until you yourself become more familiar with the standards. Philip Taylor ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
