On 12/3/10 10:24 AM, Barney Carroll wrote:
1. Could it be argued that *any* layout...
You could argue that in conversation and on paper from here to
eternity but making it happen on a screen with anything short of a
very simplistic layout is a pipe-dream. And therein may lie an answer
in and of itself: for example, you might feed the lower-IEs -- given
you work with a willing and progressive client -- a simple 600px
fixed-width version based on the same principles as advocated for
mobile handsets.
2. ... but I would be interested if
there were other reasons I may be missing.
Dunno. No problem with zoom: 1; that I know of? And, other than that
CCs mean repeated trips to the server whereas IE hacks in one style
sheet involves dragging them along to to compliant [and somewhat
compliant] browsers. As with any method it depends on the site itself
and personal opinion as to the most efficient way to handle the
particular need at hand.
Regards,
Barney Carroll
Best,
~d
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
