On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Micky Hulse <[email protected]> wrote: > Hindsight is 20/20, and a part of me is wondering if I should > re-factor my CSS to take the approach you mention. Doing so would > solve two problems that I'm having: > 2. I'd like to feed IE < 8 a static "view". Because I'm using the > "module" approach above, it's impossible to feed IEs a specific > stylesheet without re-writing or duplicating a lot of my CSS.
Related to #2, is: * No JS overhead to juggle. I could just give old IEs the desktop view and be done with it. I'm really starting to dislike all the hoop jumping I'm having to go through to get respond.js to work (one huge gripe I have, is that I can't use more than one asset server. The CDN/X-Domain setup only works from main domain to asset domain, and does not allow for others.) Ok, back to work. Sorry for my rambling. :D Cheers, M ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
