Outside of client-side web tech, technologies will often remove support for
old features that are deemed redundant because keeping them in just means a
legacy of technical debt, more to learn and room for confusion and error.

XHTML was an attempt to apply this philosophy to the web. According to the
XHTML specification, browsers that wanted to use XHTML 1.1 functionality
needed an XHTML doctype, and features outside the XHTML specification
should cause fatal errors. Of course, no-one implemented this because it
would penalise users for authors' mistakes. This is known as 'breaking the
web'. Much better for the browser's uptake if they try their best to render
the content as it was likely intended. It's from this perspective that
keeping support for these old features must be seen: ultimately
implementation is down to the browser, and if another browser is going to
keep these features but you aren't, that browser will have better
compatibility than yours.

On Sunday, 16 February 2014, <bruce.som...@web.de> wrote:

>
>
> This talk of deprecation is ludicrous! It's one thing to urge use of CSS
> for new web pages, but quite another to want to forbid the use of older,
> so-called 'deprecated' facilities.
>
> It's also silly to expect authors to comb through all of their older pages
> to eliminate everything that is not currently advocated by the numerous
> gurus.
>
> Is this deprecation nonsense known outside of the PC-world?
>
> Bruce
>
>  [css-d] Will the unsemantic HTML elements B and I be soon phased out
> ______________________________________________________________________
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org <javascript:;>]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/



-- 
Regards,
Barney Carroll

barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278

barneycarroll.com
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to