> I'm actually glad I and B are "survivors", but seeing that U and S have been > deprecated, it doesn't seem very consistent
All these elements are still around [1-4] in the canonical HTML spec [5]. Their meanings have changed slightly, making them less presentational than in the past. That they still bear presentational names, however, tends to cause confusion. I advise to use these elements only when absolutely certain that they’re used in the spirit of the spec, but to otherwise, as always, keep far, far away from any presentational markup. [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-i-element [2] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-b-element [3] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-u-element [4] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-s-element [5] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/ -- Jens O. Meiert http://meiert.com/en/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
