Hello,
it depends on which CA license the material is licensed under.
The legal FAQ clarifies it for some of them:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
For Creative Commons Share Alike 2.5/3.0 it says:
"Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 and
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 licenses may be included in
Apache products, subject to the licenses attribution clauses which may
require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. ...."
Is that the license wikipedia is licensed under?
Jörn
On 01/02/2013 05:10 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
Hi,
We would like to check in some derived features/models from Wikipedia into the
src code base and would like to double check - are Creative Commons Licenses
compatible with ASL 2.0?
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
We couldn't find it in the approved 3rd party list:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
Thanks,
Pei
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Miller [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 3:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: checking in wiki
Hi team,
I'm just about ready to check in the wikipedia small index and the new coref
features and models that take advantage of them, and I want to verify what
changes we need to make to the license/notice to allow this in the next
release. The NOTICE section has the dependent software included -- is it
sufficient to add something like this:
This product includes contents adapted from the English-language
Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) developed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).
Thanks
Tim
