Is it ok to check in like that now and fix it for a release if legal
tells us different?
On 01/02/2013 02:32 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
Yup. I think that is the one... Thanks for pointing the FAQ page Joern :).
Tim-
I believe we just need to add the blurb you had below into the NOTICE and
append the below into the LICENSE (in both src and binary distribution) just
like the other 3rd party libs.
(unless legal-discuss comes back with something else.)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
--Pei
-----Original Message-----
From: Jörn Kottmann [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 11:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Creative Commons License (was: checking in wiki)
Hello,
it depends on which CA license the material is licensed under.
The legal FAQ clarifies it for some of them:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
For Creative Commons Share Alike 2.5/3.0 it says:
"Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5
and Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 licenses may be included
in Apache products, subject to the licenses attribution clauses which may
require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. ...."
Is that the license wikipedia is licensed under?
Jörn
On 01/02/2013 05:10 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
Hi,
We would like to check in some derived features/models from Wikipedia
into the src code base and would like to double check - are Creative
Commons Licenses compatible with ASL 2.0?
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
We couldn't find it in the approved 3rd party list:
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
Thanks,
Pei
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Miller [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 3:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: checking in wiki
Hi team,
I'm just about ready to check in the wikipedia small index and the new
coref features and models that take advantage of them, and I want to verify
what changes we need to make to the license/notice to allow this in the next
release. The NOTICE section has the dependent software included -- is it
sufficient to add something like this:
This product includes contents adapted from the English-language
Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) developed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).
Thanks
Tim
