Yup.  I think that is the one... Thanks for pointing the FAQ page Joern :).
Tim-
I believe we just need to add the blurb you had below into the NOTICE and 
append the below into the LICENSE (in both src and binary distribution) just 
like the other 3rd party libs.
(unless legal-discuss comes back with something else.)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode

--Pei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jörn Kottmann [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 11:29 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Creative Commons License (was: checking in wiki)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> it depends on which CA license the material is licensed under.
> 
> The legal FAQ clarifies it for some of them:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> 
> For Creative Commons Share Alike 2.5/3.0 it says:
> "Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5
> and Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 licenses may be included
> in Apache products, subject to the licenses attribution clauses which may
> require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. ...."
> 
> Is that the license wikipedia is licensed under?
> 
> Jörn
> 
> On 01/02/2013 05:10 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We would like to check in some derived features/models from Wikipedia
> into the src code base and would like to double check - are Creative
> Commons Licenses compatible with ASL 2.0?
> > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
> > We couldn't find  it in the approved 3rd party list:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Pei
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Miller [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 3:22 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: checking in wiki
> >
> > Hi team,
> > I'm just about ready to check in the wikipedia small index and the new
> coref features and models that take advantage of them, and I want to verify
> what changes we need to make to the license/notice to allow this in the next
> release.  The NOTICE section has the dependent software included -- is it
> sufficient to add something like this:
> >
> >      This product includes contents adapted from the English-language
> >      Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) developed under the Creative Commons
> >      Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License
> >      (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).
> >
> > Thanks
> > Tim

Reply via email to