That's what I would do. Putting into SVN is different enough from including in a released archive.
> -----Original Message----- > From: ctakes-dev-return-1003-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1003-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org] > On Behalf Of Tim Miller > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 1:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Creative Commons License (was: checking in wiki) > > Is it ok to check in like that now and fix it for a release if legal tells > us different? > > On 01/02/2013 02:32 PM, Chen, Pei wrote: > > Yup. I think that is the one... Thanks for pointing the FAQ page Joern > :). > > Tim- > > I believe we just need to add the blurb you had below into the NOTICE > and append the below into the LICENSE (in both src and binary > distribution) just like the other 3rd party libs. > > (unless legal-discuss comes back with something else.) > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode > > > > --Pei > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jörn Kottmann [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 11:29 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Creative Commons License (was: checking in wiki) > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> it depends on which CA license the material is licensed under. > >> > >> The legal FAQ clarifies it for some of them: > >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > >> > >> For Creative Commons Share Alike 2.5/3.0 it says: > >> "Unmodified media under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike > >> 2.5 and Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 licenses may be > >> included in Apache products, subject to the licenses attribution > >> clauses which may require LICENSE/NOTICE/README changes. ...." > >> > >> Is that the license wikipedia is licensed under? > >> > >> Jörn > >> > >> On 01/02/2013 05:10 PM, Chen, Pei wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> We would like to check in some derived features/models from > >>> Wikipedia > >> into the src code base and would like to double check - are Creative > >> Commons Licenses compatible with ASL 2.0? > >>> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ > >>> We couldn't find it in the approved 3rd party list: > >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Pei > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Tim Miller [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 3:22 PM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: checking in wiki > >>> > >>> Hi team, > >>> I'm just about ready to check in the wikipedia small index and the > >>> new > >> coref features and models that take advantage of them, and I want to > >> verify what changes we need to make to the license/notice to allow > >> this in the next release. The NOTICE section has the dependent > >> software included -- is it sufficient to add something like this: > >>> This product includes contents adapted from the English-language > >>> Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) developed under the Creative > Commons > >>> Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License > >>> (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/). > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> Tim
