He does mention flex quite a lot though doesn't he?

I'm surprised he did not mention javafx (http://java.sun.com/javafx/),
though jre issues still apply. It will be interesting to see if the
consumer JRE 
(http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/javase/consumerjre/)
will make a difference, but it is slated for 2008..

Anybody looked into javafx?

We need a new language, javascript and xml isn't the answer.

Brian


On 6/19/07, Fritz Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you see his comments about this issue? He claims in the article that he
> started writing it before he signed with them.
>
> Either way, I think I agree with him about the current AJAX solutions being
> built to squeeze the last few drops out of a platform that was pretty much
> broken from the start.. whether the solution is Flex or something else... I
> don't know.
>
> Fritz
>
>
> On 6/19/07, Mike Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Fritz Meissner wrote:
> >
> > > Found this article by Bruce Eckel on his view of the future in RIA:
> > >
> > > http://java.sys-con.com/read/333329.htm
> >
> > Bruce Eckel is a paid Adobe shill, promoting their "Flex" stuff.  Filter
> > his opinions accordingly.
> >
> > --
> > mike morris        :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://mikro2nd.net/
> > http://mikro2nd.net/blog/planb/
> > http://mikro2nd.net/blog/mike/
> >
> > ----- A day without chillies is a day wasted ------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>  >
>


-- 
Brian Silberbauer
Consultant

+27 (0)83 566 2705
skype: brian.silberbauer

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CTJUG Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum
For the ctjug home page see http://www.ctjug.org.za
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to