E Mail wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
>I understand, some persons are simply unable to bear the discomfort that
>can result from exposure to the ideas of others,

Yes, it can be difficult to look at other ideas, but if you don't you are stuck in a rut, and learning, learning is limited to what you believe.  Some times your beliefs should be challenged,  when they are you see the other way people can look at things, and your beliefs might get stronger.  Are some of the people on the list, so insecure, they have to resort to name calling.  Let us get back to the topic, and to references..and follow the rules that this list was built on...no emailing.
and are especially
>confounded when those ideas directly challenge their own world view.  It
>is
>probably better that you filter, rather than overextend.
>>>>>>>AMEN
maybe you and squawk ought to start your own list, then you could expose
each other to the truth a
>>>>Well, the truth or even discussing another point of view is not welcomed here, at least not on this subject.  It appears in looking back at the archive people have drawn this Hawk guy into a conversation, by saying stuff like why aren't you answering....well not in those words but means the same and when he does, when anyone else does, with a different point of view  you attack.

and logic of your ideas

>>>>>>Logic...yes logic is needed on this list or at least with this discussion. I hate name calling of any kind, and it looks like that is what is expected on this list.  If someone has a different point of view you knock him/her down.  You have to learn to take your blinders off
and look at the whole picture...like different mores...and the like.  What happened in the past can not be judged correctly by today's mores.  bet you even think...that we should apologize...going to another war here, for the bombing of Hiroshima.

and you would not be lonely because you would have each other.
>>>>>>>and probably a lot more.  You answering with your rudeness is what I meant by Kris setting the tone, for this list....abusive, narrow minded.....at least with this subject and how this discussion has been going.
 

grinnin' dis time,
chris
 

>>>>>Wait !! Are you the same Kris...that has this list.now I am sounding paranoid.and you know....grinning can be done by even an idiot...<G>.... lol

See what I mean...this is how you sound...abusive. ....

>>>>>Your minds seem to be closed to any learning..all SOME of you want to do, is find a clique and go by that.  There is no basis for name calling here.

>>>>>>Remember me sending this following post in reply to someone writing this.

I would say that this list is in deep trouble---again.

>>>>Well I thought things quieted down, but I was wrong, people have to keep badgering one another and it isn't from the newbies.
> >
Remember me writing this in one of my previous posts----(trying to get back onto the topic...just watch..for name calling)

>>>Well, I wasn't wrong, was I ?  Tried to get it back on to the topic and what happens ? People get called names again !!!

I would say that this list is in deep trouble---again.
> >
>>>>>Right !! Let us get back to the topic..at hand.

>>>> I do want to learn and will, if we can get back to the points at hand.

 Now we're doing it with some other guys who think
some slavery is okay?

>>>>I never said it was okay..try to relate to the past.  Can
we condemn those, the society for different mores.  It was not necessarily wrong at
that time.

Carlene
(trying to get back onto the topic...just watch..for name
calling)
 
 
 

Reply via email to