-Caveat Lector-
Listen -up Barb and Jim,
This is my list to run as I wish. I can expose myself to any idea I wish.
If you believe that my and many others are "simply unable to bear the
discomfort that can result from exposure to the ideas of others, and are
especially
confounded when those ideas directly challenge their own world view. "
You are sadly mistaken.
I do not have to, nor will I sustain promulugation of disruption and 'evil'.
Racism and nazism are evil created by man. That is were evil comes from, man.
IMHO
Go look in the archives, Hawk and his psuedonymphette Charlene added very few
informational posts and if you read their posts, most are very disruptive and
dissension creating.
All of a sudden the lIst was topping over its 100 a message limit everyday and
there is still 'stupid' dissension and discussion going on.
The utility of the list is a big concern, for with more traffic comes problems
of time and functionality of the list and then dealing with the 'problem'.
For the problem must be dealt with or one is left with the spectacle such as
alt.conspiracy, which is awash with " ideas directly challenge" your "own
world view. "
So if you wish to challenge your world view then go right ahead. Go to
alt.conspiracy and wallow. I have found nothing in nazism, racism and
dogmatic theocratism that is worth discussing, except about what they are,
wrong.
And I have challenged my world-view many times.
Go, back in the archives and read the record and while you are at it you may
notice all what you two fine persons have contributed to our understandings.
Om
K
>> I understand, some persons are simply unable to bear the discomfort that
>> can result from exposure to the ideas of others, and are especially
>> confounded when those ideas directly challenge their own world view. It is
>> probably better that you filter, rather than overextend.
>>
>> Barb
>> >Jim Norman: Thanks Barb, for a excellent thought, expertly crafted and
clear
>to
>> its meaning. You have helped crystalize in my mind the words to express a
>> nagging "what's wrong with this picture" feeling as I followed this thread.
>I
>> couldn't understand why Hawk was castigated for simply expressing ideas.
>
>Jim Norman
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
