-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
| Any advantage of ClamWin over AVG? In other words, why not use ClamWin | instead of AVG, or vice-versa? Or would it be a good idea to use both?
I thought it was cool that you can ADD you OWN virus definitions to ClamWin as well as post them to the community project.
And ClamWin is GPL. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCPCEuXEayxvjyJdwRApR2AKC00dm+I6H42nh7tjKKjUY+vWTP7wCdEG+A 0kdzi4JWg4V3YZ92R8OXZeY= =eVhY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
_______________________________________________
CWE-LUG mailing list
http://www.cwelug.org/ [email protected]
http://lists.firepipe.net/listinfo/cwe-lug
